Oh, my, you must be lost out here on the interwebs.
Surely you were not searching for information on third-party presidential candidates?
You are not really considering voting outside the 2 candidate status quo.
Just because you are fed up to the ears with the same-old same-old business-as-usual election orthodoxy where your choices are two "polar opposite" parties whose elected members end up doing the same thing, on the rare occasion where something actually gets done? Fer shame on ya.
You can't seriously imagine electing a candidate willing to talk with, and even chastise, both sides of the aisle. What, are youse nuts? Fuggedaboudit!
You would like to vote for someone, instead of against someone? Well, bless your heart, darlin'.
It may seem crazy, but yes, it is true - for the 2020 presidential race, there are Greater Than 2 Candidates. You are not limited to demoican or repucrat.
There are four candidates on the ballots of enough states to acquire the needed 270 electoral college votes.
In random order, they are:
Elections are about the future - even if a third-party candidate does not win, reaching 5% of the national vote changes the future. Yes, really. Because the public funding becomes available to a "minor party" which is defined as a party getting 5 - 25 % of the popular vote.
"But I don't want to waste my vote"... If you believe votes can be wasted, well guess what? In two-way races, 49.9% of all presidential votes are wasted. Every election. All votes for the losers are wasted, and all votes over what are needed to win a state are "wasted" in that they do not affect the outcome.
But in reality, the only "wasted vote" is an unused vote. Standing up for what you believe is right, even when it doesn't match popular opinion, is not "wasting" your first amendment rights. Elections that are won by slim margins send a message that is distinctly different than the message sent by a landslide win.
If you think this bipolar choice presented by the two party status quo isn't acceptable, be weird and "vote your conscience."